Scientism Example 2: Debate
2. Question: Is debate an effective way of changing people's minds (teaching)?
3. Investigation:
- The Biblical debates are irrelevant, because mythological.
- Academic debate is irrelevant, because an attempt to win points. The same is true of legal debating.
- In teaching situations, debate takes time which could be used for clear teaching.
- I have never convinced anyone through debate.
- I have convinced by teaching open-minded students.
- However, I myself have occasionally been convinced through debate. This implies I am unusually open minded.
- Debate is often construed by the observer(s) as lack of assurance or defensiveness; one appears to be "trying to prove one's own point".
- Essays, books, and other literature of debate require much time to read and to write. This time could be used studying evidence (investigating) and/ or teaching.
- I am much more convinced by demonstration (works) than by argument (words). The evidence of my lifetime suggests that other people are also more convinced by works than by words.
- Debate is not effective for teaching; it has mostly a negative effect.
- Teaching open-minded people is effective, especially when it includes examples (works).
5. Action:
- I resolve not to debate from now on, mentally, verbally, or in writing.
- I will seek out open-minded people as students.
- I will teach persistently, firmly and patiently.
- I will use my own example, demonstrations, and other works as often as possible.
- I will not respond to debate challenges, but will "teach around" them.
No comments:
Post a Comment